34  |
|
|
|
 |
drove my Chevy to the levy but the
levy was dry
Rob van Kranenburg
I don’t know how to say this really, as I never do, but
I got this song in my head ‘Bye, bye, Miss American Pie,
drove my Chevy to the levy but the levy was dry’ and it is
a few days now, and tonight finally I figure out why. Let me tell
you. [...] The public is insecure. We will restore faith in themselves
by creating dignity poses: individual fake memories that will restore
self confidence (the rescue of a child, standing up to an assailant
on your younger brother…). The factuality of these poses
will be enhanced because the public wears an always on camera,
so it must be real. We will write the software to decide between
different recordings of events, and so we hold the key to communal
experience. |
|
|
 |
Posthumous society.
On the implications of a transition via transhuman - to posthuman
society
Gabriel Pickard
I call to get involved in developing projects that aid intelligence
in new, connective and interactive forms. I do not primarily call
for the simulation of human intellect, however i do call for “critical
coding”, for technological development that breaks with forerunning
paradigms if necessary. My personal take is that a close look at
phenomenology might help us in finding alternatives to brute-force
attacks on intelligence (eg. neural networks). Thinking about new,
flexible forms of representation, as well as enacting meaning might
be the outcome. Developments such as the Semantic Web working group
and generally the growing popularity of mapping analysis, seem
to be interesting approaches, steps forward on the level of
representation. But to transcend that level, we need a more profound
and critical theory to apply. |
|
|
 |
Confessions of a whitneybiennial.com
Curator
Patrick Lichty
In reflecting upon whitneybiennial.com then, what are the questions
did it ask, and continue to put to us? Does it posit a fundamental
shift in the art world with radical implications for future exhibitions
in light of online art? Does it herald the invalidation of the
legitimacy of major shows like the Whitney Biennial through the
capability to create media attention via tactical means? Does it
suggest that with the advent of new media art, the space of representation
for the work of art has now become nomadic, and free of the institution?
Or perhaps more succinctly, could whitneybiennial.com have been
a further conceptual expansion on Manetas’ play with the
insidious practice of branding as a unique part of American culture?
Or had it asked questions that had already been asked in previous
Whitney Biennials, but merely in different terms. |
|
|
 |
ASN: Reinventing Social Networks
Interview with Ken Jordan by Geert Lovink
New York-based Ken Jordan is one the ASN authors (together with
Jan Hauser and Steven Foster). Ken is a pioneer of Web-based multimedia.
[...] In arts
and theory circles he is known for Multimedia: From Wagner
to Virtual Reality, an anthology (co-edited with Randall Packer) that traces
the secret history of digital multimedia. With
Ken Jordan I discussed the call for trust and the question of sustainable
social networks. Is the Internet consensus culture
cure or disease? Instead of merely posing the power question, like
in the case of ICANN and WSIS, the ASN initiative points at exciting
conceptual realms out there in which civil society is not just
a user, not a victim of governments and Microsofts. Instead, it
positions itself in the drivers seat and takes place at the drawing
board of the network society. |
|
|
 |
The Myth of Meritocracy in Fine
Arts
Dyske Suematsu
In a field like fine arts whose primary concern is subjectivity,
what does meritocracy mean? Merriam-Webster defines it, “a
system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the
basis of their achievement.” That is, a meritocracy assumes
that achievement and reward are two separate issues. In sports,
science, and business, for instance, meritocracy is relatively
easy to define: winning competitions, discoveries, inventions,
profits, and so on. Meritocracy is a system of rewarding based
on measurable merit. Unless the achievement is measurable to some
degree, rewarding based on merit is impossible. Andy Warhol once
said that a measure of good art is its price. In response, some
would argue that an artwork could have a high price tag but be
devoid of any artistic merit. Such presumed discrepancies are what
often bring up the question of meritocracy. |
|
|
34  |
|
|
|












Iscriviti! - Join!

|